|
If you can't read this mail, please click here: http://www.jvrhmfr.xyz/bulletin
|
| No. 12 • 15 March 2004 | |
|
|
||||||||||||||
| College
issue On the issue of a 20% salary cut, which the staff representatives believed should be reconsidered, the Management explained the percentage was arrived at, based on a financial model used by the Working Group to calculate the College's expected expenditure and income for staff salary between 2004 and 2008. The model took into account a number of assumptions, primarily the income to be generated from self-financing programmes and the actual expenditure -- mainly staff salaries, but it did not, as the staff representatives were led to believe, factor in a 10% sector-wide cut in higher education funding in 2005-08. The Working Group recognized that both income and expenditure may vary significantly over the next four years, but all the available surplus will be left with the New College, with full autonomy to decide on its own financial matters. The Working Group reckoned that with a 20% reduction in salary cost, inclusive of the two rounds of 3% salary cuts in January 2004 and 2005, the University is prepared to absorb the resultant shortfall projected over the next four years. The University, moreover, is committed to paying housing and other fringe benefits of the College staff up to 2008. All these commitments, including a guarantee of employment in the transitional period, will add up to a substantial amount, which, in essence, represents a collective compensation package for affected College staff. On the issue of income from the Telford operation, which some staff representatives said was omitted from the calculations and should help contribute towards the new College's overall financial well-being, the understanding was that the exact cost and revenue from Telford are yet to be determined. Any surplus from the Telford operation, past and future, however, will go into the reserve of the new College, and not ploughed back to the University, in order to provide a firmer financial footing for the new operation. The Working Group recommends that, provided that the new College is successful, its management can review the staff salary in 2006, and may decide to reward staff with bonuses based on performance. Instead of "divvying it up now" for individual staff members, the new College will need a reserve when its operation begins on 1 July 2004. The reserve will be used to meet emerging needs, for example, replacing staff who are planning to leave, or hiring new academic staff to meet growth in self-financing programmes. Prof Tong also told the staff representatives that Prof H K Chang, President, after the Council's approval of the Working Group report, wrote again to the UGC for help in staff compensation.
|
||||||||||||||
| ADP
2005-08
|
||||||||||||||
| 20th
Anniversary
More celebration activities are on the way.
|
||||||||||||||
| Visit
of Shimon Peres
|
||||||||||||||
|
CityU
Today magazine
|
||||||||||||||
| Back to Bulletin archive | ||||||||||||||
| |
88娱乐城址| 大发888娱乐城好么| 最好的百家乐官网好评平台都有哪些| 巴黎人百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 申博太阳城娱乐城| 澳门百家乐官网论谈| 百家乐游戏试| 林芝县| 百家乐鞋业| 百家乐官网现场新全讯网| 至尊百家乐娱乐网| 水果老虎机破解| 沙龙百家乐官网娱乐网| 利高百家乐娱乐城| 皇冠网上投注| 百家乐官网平预测软件| 百家乐赌场现金网| 百家乐官网赌博论谈| 大发888游戏平台银河| 新世纪娱乐成| 威尼斯人娱乐城位置| 百家乐官网太阳城线上| 德州扑克牌| 威尼斯人娱乐城官方站| 百家乐赢钱lv| 百家乐官网连闲几率| 娱乐城简介| 大发888官网 ylc8| 娱乐网百家乐补丁| 百家乐官网赌博是否违法| 富川| 达尔| 太阳城娱乐城备用网址| 威尼斯人娱乐网反| 网上百家乐骗人的| 百家乐官网大娱乐场开户注册| 太阳城雨伞| 跨国际百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 太阳城百家乐出千技术| 百家乐如何计算| 百家乐官网棋牌游戏正式版|