波音游戏-波音娱乐城赌球打不开

 

Individual Counselling: Secondary School (Social Worker Strategies)

Reactive Aggressor

Wai's case

During recess, some students were looking at photos of their trip and their excited discussion attracted Wai’s attention. When the class bell rang, the students lowered their voices and waited for the teacher. However, Wai thought they were discussing and laughing at a photo of him falling over, so he confronted them angrily. He shouted and attacked them, asking them to hand over the photo of him falling over, which confused his classmates.

Wai's considerations and actions
Cognition
  • Misinterprets the external cues: Wai does not consider all of the available information when receiving outside messages; he focuses on certain kinds of sensory information. He only sees his classmates speaking softly and laughing, but does not hear the class bell ring.
  • Cognitive distortion: he thinks that his classmates are circulating a photo of him falling on the floor and are making fun of him.
  • Hostile attributional bias: his classmates are sharing their happy memories of the school picnic, but he thinks they are mocking him.
  • Poor problem-solving skills: when encountering interpersonal conflicts, he can only respond with accusations and aggression.
Emotion
  • Impulsive: Wai does not wait to find out what is actually happening before attacking his classmates.
  • Agitated emotion: he is unable to control his emotions even in the presence of other classmates, and responds with aggressive behaviour.
Behaviour
  • Attacks everything in the surrounding area: he not only attacks his classmates, but also kicks the chairs around.
  • Stubborn: he insists his classmates delete the photo and assumes they are acting maliciously.
Social network
  • Poor social and communication skills: Wai does not know how to express his own thoughts and feelings.
  • Isolated and socially excluded: his agitated emotions and behaviour make his classmates wary of interacting with him.

Evaluate irrational beliefs

  • Understand how these students perceive social information, and determine what kinds of social cues they fail to perceive.
  • Determine the weaknesses in processing sensory information that distort their social information processing.
  • Evaluate the irrational beliefs underpinning students’ hostile attributional bias

At this evaluation stage, social workers should focus on the weakness in reactive aggressor students’ senses and sensory processing. Obviously, in this case, Wai had a strong visual sense but poor auditory sense, showing that the latter needed attention. After understanding the thoughts generating his agitated emotions, social workers found that Wai tended to overgeneralise his irrational beliefs to a singular belief that his classmates would do harm to him; this is a classic example of the type of hostile attributional bias displayed by a reactive aggressor.

Dispute irrational beliefs

  • Encourage reactive aggressor students to identify their own cognitive blind spots, and help them to explore other possible reasons for the anticipated events.
  • Explain how irrational beliefs lead to anger and impulsivity, and how not to base behaviour solely on subjective interpretations

Social workers can review the details of the incident with the students, and point out how their focusing one form of sensory input was detrimental to their gaining a full and accurate impression of the incident.

It is also important to encourage reactive-aggressor students to consider whether there is evidence to support their negative and extreme thoughts, or whether there are other interpretations. Then, social workers should help the students to perceive the incident using different senses and from new perspectives. Social workers also need to let the students understand that their negative and extreme thoughts will lead to many other negative consequences, to increase their motivation to change.

Finally, social workers should teach reactive-aggressor students self-questioning skills, to help them challenge their own irrational beliefs, and construct new, rational beliefs.

Back to Top

© 2019 City University of Hong Kong          Project on Children and Adolescents at Risk Education (Project C.A.R.E.)
怎么玩百家乐官网呀| 百家乐官网制胜法| 利来百家乐官网娱乐| rmb百家乐的玩法技巧和规则 | 百家乐视频双扣下载| 澳盈88娱乐城| 互博百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 大发888娱乐场网页版| 百家乐官网技巧大全| 百家乐有好的投注法吗| 3d大赢家| 沙龙国际在线| 大东方百家乐游戏| 博彩赌场| 百家乐娱乐天上人间| 无锡市| 百家乐缆法排行榜| 百家乐官网有不有作弊| 百家乐龙虎玩| 百家乐官网技真人荷官| 威尼斯人娱乐城最新地址| 广州百家乐官网娱乐场| 百家乐群shozo| 百家乐官网10个人| 大发888网页| 戒掉百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 大发888 casino组件下载| 百家乐官网平注常赢规则| 网上现金博彩网| 百家乐投注平台信誉排行| 百家乐官网是如何骗人的| 百家乐官网龙虎台布价格| 威尼斯人娱乐城线上博彩| 网上百家乐官网娱乐场开户注册 | 云博国际| 百家乐扑克桌布| 大发888排行| 百家乐官网平注常赢玩法更| 东方夏威夷网站| 澳门百家乐小游戏| 百家乐官网长龙如何判断|