波音游戏-波音娱乐城赌球打不开

Hong Kong Insolvency and Restructuring Law and Policy in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond

Grant type

Principal investigator

Principal investigator
Prof WAN Wai Yee

Others Co-investigator

Others Co-investigator
Assoc. Prof. Kelvin KWOK
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Gerard MCCORMACK
(School of Law, LEEDS)
Prof. MO Lai Lan Phyllis
(Department of Accountancy, CityU)
Mr Alwin CHAN
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Kelvin LOW
(National University of Singapore)
Prof. LI, Linda Che-lan
(Department of Public Policy, CityU)
Prof. Susan BRIGHT
(Faculty of Law, OXFORD)
Assoc. Prof. QI Yaxuan
(Department of Economics and Finance, CityU)

Research Focus

Research Focus

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of insolvency filings by otherwise economically viable firms globally is expected to rise significantly. Hong Kong will not be an exception. The collapse of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) will have a serious impact in Hong Kong as SMEs account for 45% of the private sector total employment and 98% of all of the business establishments. The Government is proposing to enact legislative reforms to allow for provisional supervision and corporate rescue, which are out-of-court procedures, to facilitate restructuring if the major secured creditor consents.

Even if the reforms based on provisional supervision are enacted, the restructuring framework in Hong Kong remains very much creditor-driven and does not have the features of a debtor-driven restructuring regime. Hong Kong’s restructuring framework is found in the form of consensual workout, and a legislative framework in the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622 (HK) that comprises a scheme of arrangement (scheme), based on the English scheme, and provisional liquidation. While Hong Kong’s restructuring regime has served it well through the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the global financial crisis of 2008, it cannot be assumed that it will work through the COVID-19 crisis.

The current regime faces three key limitations that were not present in the earlier crises: first, the scheme is geared towards restructuring of financial debt, similar to the scheme in the UK. It is not clear if schemes would be cost-effective to restructure financial and operational debt of large numbers of SMEs expected to be in default. Second, in times of crises, fresh financing is required and, unlike the earlier crises, there can be no expectation that SMEs can access fresh financing. Third, SMEs face special and urgent problems with respect to arrears in rental and performance of contractual obligations that are disrupted by COVID-19. Without special legislation or measures to constrain enforcement or impose a standstill for the leases and other contracts, there remains the concern that the leases will be terminated (thereby prematurely ending otherwise viable businesses in sectors such as retail) and/or courts will be overwhelmed with the litigation.

Finally, the COVID-19 crisis also raises the broader question as to the future of a creditor-driven insolvency law in Hong Kong, given the likely economic impact of the crisis on the SMEs and other larger firms. Our project gathers the necessary social data, bring comparative analysis that is contextualised to Hong Kong, and advance it.

 

Themes

bg

Contact

Phone: +(852)-3442-9111
Email: waiywan@cityu.edu.hk
娱乐城开户送金| 百家乐l路单| 百家乐官网算点子打法攻略| 云赢百家乐分析| 百家乐官网号论坛博彩正网| 帝王百家乐新足球平台| 甘肃省| 番禺百家乐官网电器店| 大发888线上| 百家乐官网什么平台好| 百家乐天下| 财神百家乐官网娱乐城| 新东泰百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 迪威百家乐官网赌场娱乐网规则| 大发扑克网| 视频百家乐是真是假| 网上百家乐官网大赢家筹码| 久盛国际娱乐城| 怎样看百家乐路单| 百家乐官网怎么刷反水| 澳门顶级赌场金鹰娱乐| 百家乐官网平注常赢玩法更| 皇冠网hg3155| 百家乐赢家打法| 百家乐官网程序开户发| 雷山县| 百家乐赌博导航| 回力百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐作弊| 菲律宾太阳城网| 百家乐玩法既规则| 棋牌娱乐城注册送58| 百家乐空调维修| 大众百家乐官网娱乐城| 百家乐官网8点直赢| 通化大嘴棋牌官方下载| 柬埔寨百家乐的玩法技巧和规则 | 大发888分析| 百家乐娱乐城主页| 百家乐官网体育宝贝| 六合彩官方|