波音游戏-波音娱乐城赌球打不开

Hong Kong Insolvency and Restructuring Law and Policy in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond

Grant type

Principal investigator

Principal investigator
Prof WAN Wai Yee

Others Co-investigator

Others Co-investigator
Assoc. Prof. Kelvin KWOK
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Gerard MCCORMACK
(School of Law, LEEDS)
Prof. MO Lai Lan Phyllis
(Department of Accountancy, CityU)
Mr Alwin CHAN
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Kelvin LOW
(National University of Singapore)
Prof. LI, Linda Che-lan
(Department of Public Policy, CityU)
Prof. Susan BRIGHT
(Faculty of Law, OXFORD)
Assoc. Prof. QI Yaxuan
(Department of Economics and Finance, CityU)

Research Focus

Research Focus

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of insolvency filings by otherwise economically viable firms globally is expected to rise significantly. Hong Kong will not be an exception. The collapse of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) will have a serious impact in Hong Kong as SMEs account for 45% of the private sector total employment and 98% of all of the business establishments. The Government is proposing to enact legislative reforms to allow for provisional supervision and corporate rescue, which are out-of-court procedures, to facilitate restructuring if the major secured creditor consents.

Even if the reforms based on provisional supervision are enacted, the restructuring framework in Hong Kong remains very much creditor-driven and does not have the features of a debtor-driven restructuring regime. Hong Kong’s restructuring framework is found in the form of consensual workout, and a legislative framework in the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622 (HK) that comprises a scheme of arrangement (scheme), based on the English scheme, and provisional liquidation. While Hong Kong’s restructuring regime has served it well through the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the global financial crisis of 2008, it cannot be assumed that it will work through the COVID-19 crisis.

The current regime faces three key limitations that were not present in the earlier crises: first, the scheme is geared towards restructuring of financial debt, similar to the scheme in the UK. It is not clear if schemes would be cost-effective to restructure financial and operational debt of large numbers of SMEs expected to be in default. Second, in times of crises, fresh financing is required and, unlike the earlier crises, there can be no expectation that SMEs can access fresh financing. Third, SMEs face special and urgent problems with respect to arrears in rental and performance of contractual obligations that are disrupted by COVID-19. Without special legislation or measures to constrain enforcement or impose a standstill for the leases and other contracts, there remains the concern that the leases will be terminated (thereby prematurely ending otherwise viable businesses in sectors such as retail) and/or courts will be overwhelmed with the litigation.

Finally, the COVID-19 crisis also raises the broader question as to the future of a creditor-driven insolvency law in Hong Kong, given the likely economic impact of the crisis on the SMEs and other larger firms. Our project gathers the necessary social data, bring comparative analysis that is contextualised to Hong Kong, and advance it.

 

Themes

bg

Contact

Phone: +(852)-3442-9111
Email: waiywan@cityu.edu.hk
怎么看百家乐路单| 百家乐官网玩法的技巧| ewin棋牌官网| 百家乐官网www| 威尼斯人娱乐城返佣| 百家乐官网打水论坛| 维也纳国际娱乐城| 真百家乐游戏| 百家乐官网是片人的吗| 澳门百家乐官方网站破解百家乐技巧| 百家乐官网有公式| 孙吴县| 东方太阳城二手房| 百家乐是骗人的么| 百家乐官网真人娱乐注册| 太阳城菲律宾官方网| 百家乐77s| 罗盘24山图| 百家乐官网五星宏辉怎么玩| 年辖:市辖区| 罗浮宫百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 投真钱百家乐官网必输吗| 百家乐官网玩法说明| 德州扑克秘籍| 百家乐博赌场娱乐网规则| 做生意的十大风水禁忌| 百家乐官网高额投注| 百家乐官网压钱技巧| 澳门百家乐官网死局| bet365百家乐| 百家乐五铺的缆是什么意思| 威尼斯人娱乐城网址| 永利高娱乐城| 太阳城娱乐城网站| 博彩评级| 大发888真钱注册| 大发888官网多少| 威尼斯人娱乐城安全吗| E世博| 最好的百家乐官网娱乐场| 镇远县|