波音游戏-波音娱乐城赌球打不开

Hong Kong Insolvency and Restructuring Law and Policy in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond

Grant type

Principal investigator

Principal investigator
Prof WAN Wai Yee

Others Co-investigator

Others Co-investigator
Assoc. Prof. Kelvin KWOK
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Gerard MCCORMACK
(School of Law, LEEDS)
Prof. MO Lai Lan Phyllis
(Department of Accountancy, CityU)
Mr Alwin CHAN
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Kelvin LOW
(National University of Singapore)
Prof. LI, Linda Che-lan
(Department of Public Policy, CityU)
Prof. Susan BRIGHT
(Faculty of Law, OXFORD)
Assoc. Prof. QI Yaxuan
(Department of Economics and Finance, CityU)

Research Focus

Research Focus

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of insolvency filings by otherwise economically viable firms globally is expected to rise significantly. Hong Kong will not be an exception. The collapse of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) will have a serious impact in Hong Kong as SMEs account for 45% of the private sector total employment and 98% of all of the business establishments. The Government is proposing to enact legislative reforms to allow for provisional supervision and corporate rescue, which are out-of-court procedures, to facilitate restructuring if the major secured creditor consents.

Even if the reforms based on provisional supervision are enacted, the restructuring framework in Hong Kong remains very much creditor-driven and does not have the features of a debtor-driven restructuring regime. Hong Kong’s restructuring framework is found in the form of consensual workout, and a legislative framework in the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622 (HK) that comprises a scheme of arrangement (scheme), based on the English scheme, and provisional liquidation. While Hong Kong’s restructuring regime has served it well through the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the global financial crisis of 2008, it cannot be assumed that it will work through the COVID-19 crisis.

The current regime faces three key limitations that were not present in the earlier crises: first, the scheme is geared towards restructuring of financial debt, similar to the scheme in the UK. It is not clear if schemes would be cost-effective to restructure financial and operational debt of large numbers of SMEs expected to be in default. Second, in times of crises, fresh financing is required and, unlike the earlier crises, there can be no expectation that SMEs can access fresh financing. Third, SMEs face special and urgent problems with respect to arrears in rental and performance of contractual obligations that are disrupted by COVID-19. Without special legislation or measures to constrain enforcement or impose a standstill for the leases and other contracts, there remains the concern that the leases will be terminated (thereby prematurely ending otherwise viable businesses in sectors such as retail) and/or courts will be overwhelmed with the litigation.

Finally, the COVID-19 crisis also raises the broader question as to the future of a creditor-driven insolvency law in Hong Kong, given the likely economic impact of the crisis on the SMEs and other larger firms. Our project gathers the necessary social data, bring comparative analysis that is contextualised to Hong Kong, and advance it.

 

Themes

bg

Contact

Phone: +(852)-3442-9111
Email: waiywan@cityu.edu.hk
百家乐官网牌机的破解法| 百家乐官网解析| 新野县| 速博网上娱乐| 博彩乐百家乐平台| 百家乐官网哪家信誉好| 和龙市| 金沙百家乐官网现金网| 百家乐赌博破解| 博彩网百家乐官网全讯网| 蒙特卡罗国际网址| 百家乐优惠现金| 大发888官方网站| 百家乐概率下注法| 澳门百家乐官网娱乐城信誉如何 | 真人百家乐官网新开户送彩金 | 安桌百家乐官网游戏百家乐官网 | 皇冠开户娱乐网| 百家乐龙虎台布多少钱| 杭州百家乐官网西园| 百家乐官网会骗人吗| 太阳城百家乐的破解| 博彩公司| 大发888网页版登陆| 百家乐五子棋| 汉百家乐官网春| 百家乐官网赌场娱乐| 威尼斯人娱乐城信誉好吗| 百家乐太阳城小郭| 百家乐官网获胜秘决百家乐官网获胜秘诀| 环球百家乐娱乐城| 哈尔滨百家乐赌场| 沈阳娱网棋牌官方下载| 百家乐官网怎么才能| 苏尼特右旗| 十六浦娱乐城官网| 百家乐7人桌布| 澳门百家乐现场视频| 金字塔百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 威尼斯人娱乐cheng| 顶旺亚洲|