波音游戏-波音娱乐城赌球打不开

Hong Kong Insolvency and Restructuring Law and Policy in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond

Grant type

Principal investigator

Principal investigator
Prof WAN Wai Yee

Others Co-investigator

Others Co-investigator
Assoc. Prof. Kelvin KWOK
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Gerard MCCORMACK
(School of Law, LEEDS)
Prof. MO Lai Lan Phyllis
(Department of Accountancy, CityU)
Mr Alwin CHAN
(Faculty of Law, HKU)
Prof. Kelvin LOW
(National University of Singapore)
Prof. LI, Linda Che-lan
(Department of Public Policy, CityU)
Prof. Susan BRIGHT
(Faculty of Law, OXFORD)
Assoc. Prof. QI Yaxuan
(Department of Economics and Finance, CityU)

Research Focus

Research Focus

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of insolvency filings by otherwise economically viable firms globally is expected to rise significantly. Hong Kong will not be an exception. The collapse of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) will have a serious impact in Hong Kong as SMEs account for 45% of the private sector total employment and 98% of all of the business establishments. The Government is proposing to enact legislative reforms to allow for provisional supervision and corporate rescue, which are out-of-court procedures, to facilitate restructuring if the major secured creditor consents.

Even if the reforms based on provisional supervision are enacted, the restructuring framework in Hong Kong remains very much creditor-driven and does not have the features of a debtor-driven restructuring regime. Hong Kong’s restructuring framework is found in the form of consensual workout, and a legislative framework in the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622 (HK) that comprises a scheme of arrangement (scheme), based on the English scheme, and provisional liquidation. While Hong Kong’s restructuring regime has served it well through the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the global financial crisis of 2008, it cannot be assumed that it will work through the COVID-19 crisis.

The current regime faces three key limitations that were not present in the earlier crises: first, the scheme is geared towards restructuring of financial debt, similar to the scheme in the UK. It is not clear if schemes would be cost-effective to restructure financial and operational debt of large numbers of SMEs expected to be in default. Second, in times of crises, fresh financing is required and, unlike the earlier crises, there can be no expectation that SMEs can access fresh financing. Third, SMEs face special and urgent problems with respect to arrears in rental and performance of contractual obligations that are disrupted by COVID-19. Without special legislation or measures to constrain enforcement or impose a standstill for the leases and other contracts, there remains the concern that the leases will be terminated (thereby prematurely ending otherwise viable businesses in sectors such as retail) and/or courts will be overwhelmed with the litigation.

Finally, the COVID-19 crisis also raises the broader question as to the future of a creditor-driven insolvency law in Hong Kong, given the likely economic impact of the crisis on the SMEs and other larger firms. Our project gathers the necessary social data, bring comparative analysis that is contextualised to Hong Kong, and advance it.

 

Themes

bg

Contact

Phone: +(852)-3442-9111
Email: [email protected]
潜江市| 娱乐城官方网站| 新全讯网22335555| 视频百家乐官网是真是假| 大发888吧| 百家乐投注网| 百家乐是不是有技巧| 博发娱乐| 超级百家乐2龙虎斗| 百家乐官网稳赢技法| 大发888官方6222.| 百家乐庄闲路| 24山向方位度数| 南京百家乐官网赌博现场被抓| 莆田棋牌游戏下载| 百家乐赌博机怎么玩| 高科技百家乐官网牌具| 义马市| 凱旋門百家乐娱乐城| 长乐坊百家乐娱乐城| HG百家乐官网大转轮| 皇家金堡娱乐| 澳门百家乐国际娱乐城| 百家乐官网怎赌才赢钱| 百家乐官网现实赌场| 大发娱乐城888| 百家乐英皇娱乐场| 百家乐官网官网站| 百家乐官网桌出租| 百家乐赢钱心得| 博久百家乐论坛| 网上百家乐官网骗人的吗| 大发888扑克下载| 百家乐视频交友| 百家乐官网全程打庄| 猫游棋牌下载| 庞博百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐博彩策略论坛| 百家乐官网平台开发| 沐川县| 新宝百家乐网址|